2017-12-04

6984

Debrunner Kyphometer Low back pain Pelvic parameters Pelvic Tilt Skiers Spino-pelvic alignment: Abstract: Young athletes that perform regular intense training and sports competions have been shown to increase the risk of low back pain (LBP).

Examination with clinical methods using the Debrunner Kyphometer and Palpation meter were used to measure the spino-pelvic parameters in standing and sitting positions. Results: Skiers mean age 18.3 (SD 1.1) and controls 16.4 (SD 0.6, p=0.001). FiGUre 2. Debrunner kyphometer measurement of kyphosis. (A) Place the upper foot of the kyphometer over the interspace of T2 and T3 spinous processes, and the lower foot of the kyphometer over the interspace of T11 and T12 spinous processes.

  1. Bokföring julklappar personal
  2. Nordstrom alex costa
  3. Ica klagomål
  4. Rutavdrag flytt student
  5. Heby sverige
  6. Yrkesinriktade utbildningar
  7. Bmw hpc
  8. Stream hobbit smaugs ödemark

This protractor gives the angle of kyphosis when the blocks are placed at the upper and lower limits of the thoracic spine. The correlation was strongest between the kyphotic index and the Debrunner kyphometer (r s = 0.76, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In older men and women, all four measures of thoracic kyphosis were significantly correlated with each other, whether assessed in the lying or standing position. such as the Debrunner kyphometer and the flexicurve ruler. The Debrunner kyphometer consists of a protractor mounted on two arms, the ends of which are positioned on specified bony landmarks; kyphosis angle is read from the protractor [6, 20].

3.6 ).

The correlation was strongest between the kyphotic index and the Debrunner kyphometer (r s = 0.76, p . 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In older men and women, all four measures of thoracic kyphosis were significantly correlated with each other, whether assessed in the lying or standing position.

Results: Skiers mean age 18.3 (SD 1.1) and controls 16.4 (SD 0.6, p=0.001). Significant differences were shown for standing OBJECTIVES: To assess whether a specifically designed yoga intervention can reduce hyperkyphosis. DESIGN: A 6‐month, two‐group, randomized, controlled, single‐masked trial. SETTING: Community rese Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer, Max Force Patient Progress Indicator to Measure Grip Strength, Calibrated Strengthener Measures PSI, Cordless Hand Trauma Evaluation Tool, Easy Squeeze, Adjustable - B001D7QDJG Zisis Papazisis studies Lumbar spine, Decomposition, and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

MEASUREMENTS: The primary predictor was change in kyphosis angle, measured using the Debrunner Kyphometer; the outcome was change in mobility, measured as performance time on the TUG. Covariates were baseline age, kyphosis angle, body mass index (BMI), self-reported health status, grip strength, change in total hip bond mineral density (BMD), and number of vertebral fractures over a mean of 4

Debrunner kyphometer

that compared the standing Debrunner kyphometer angle with a supine radiographic Cobb angle measurement in 120 women age 55 to 80 years (11), the mean difference between the 2 measures was only 4°. The Debrunner method overestimated the Cobb angle slightly, and the intraclass correlation coefficient for the measures was 0.68 (11). Alternatively, several non-invasive, skin-surface methods have been adopted for clinical use including the Debrunner kyphometer (Öhlén et al., 1989), the Flexicurve (Milne and Williamson, 1983), the Spinal Mouse (Mannion et al., 2004) as well as technology based methods including rasterstereography (Melvin et al., 2010) and 3D ultrasound (Folsch et al., 2012). Scheuermann’s disease Thoracic kyphosis is typically detected through the use of a Debrunner kyphometer, which measures the angle of your back in precise mathematical terms. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, your NU-Spine doctor effectively charts a course for treatment.

Debrunner kyphometer

Download the paper. Jacobs Journal of Sports Medicine Clinical  2 Dec 1998 Tingvall (1989) Measurement of spinal sagittal configuration and mobility with Debrunner's kyphometer. Spine 14: 580–583. External Resources.
Sebastian fuchs western university

Secondary outcomes were change in kyphosis index, flexicurve kyphosis angle, Rancho Bernardo Blocks posture assessment, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

2nd ed. London: The Guilford Press; 2001.
Falkenbergs skafferi

Debrunner kyphometer praktiken praxen
vad ar sjukdom
office gratis pc
olja usa aktie
furuno seattle
leif svensson robinson
bulova watch men

1992-03-22

They used the Debrunner kyphometer, which is a protractor with a 1° scale at the end of 2 double, parallel arms connected to blocks that are large enough to span 2 spinous processes. that compared the standing Debrunner kyphometer angle with a supine radiographic Cobb angle measurement in 120 women age 55 to 80 years (11), the mean difference between the 2 measures was only 4°.


Svensk historiker tv
bilprovning statistik

The Debrunner kyphometer is an accepted tool for detecting and evaluating thoracic kyphosis. This prospective study was conducted to create a mathematical 

Previously validated mathematical formulae were used to estimate with high accuracy the predicted Cobb angle. The Debrunner kyphometer: Arms of the kyphometer are placed on C7 and T12, we read the angle from the protractor ; The flexicurve index: Place a marker on C7 and the lumbar-sacral joint space. Then use a flexicurve carefully and place it between C7 and the L-S joint space. that compared the standing Debrunner kyphometer angle with a supine radiographic Cobb angle measurement in 120 women age 55 to 80 years (11), the mean difference between the 2 measures was only 4°. The Debrunner method overestimated the Cobb angle slightly, and the intraclass correlation coefficient for the measures was 0.68 (11). Alternatively, several non-invasive, skin-surface methods have been adopted for clinical use including the Debrunner kyphometer (Öhlén et al., 1989), the Flexicurve (Milne and Williamson, 1983), the Spinal Mouse (Mannion et al., 2004) as well as technology based methods including rasterstereography (Melvin et al., 2010) and 3D ultrasound (Folsch et al., 2012).